http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/ Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-727 pet containment fence Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:29:53 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-727 Very well picked, that is what I was thinking about, it's perhaps a spelling mistake nothing more than that, right! Very well picked, that is what I was thinking about, it's perhaps a spelling mistake nothing more than that, right!

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-599 pet containment fence Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:29:53 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-599 Very well picked, that is what I was thinking about, it's perhaps a spelling mistake nothing more than that, right! Very well picked, that is what I was thinking about, it's perhaps a spelling mistake nothing more than that, right!

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-397 daviddonovan Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:31:57 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-397 In the second paragraph under "Don't get smart" I think you mean "elicit", not "illicit". In the second paragraph under “Don’t get smart” I think you mean “elicit”, not “illicit”.

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1607 daviddonovan Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:31:00 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-1607 In the second paragraph under "Don't get smart" I think you mean "elicit", not "illicit". In the second paragraph under “Don’t get smart” I think you mean “elicit”, not “illicit”.

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-398 Nichole Schrupp Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:54:21 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-398 You're absolutely right in what you're saying. I understand that the "Big" words are often easy for us to use, but most people understand you much easier and have a more pleasant time reading your work if you speak direct toward them in words they are familiar with. You’re absolutely right in what you’re saying. I understand that the “Big” words are often easy for us to use, but most people understand you much easier and have a more pleasant time reading your work if you speak direct toward them in words they are familiar with.

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1608 Nichole Schrupp Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:54:00 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-1608 You're absolutely right in what you're saying. I understand that the "Big" words are often easy for us to use, but most people understand you much easier and have a more pleasant time reading your work if you speak direct toward them in words they are familiar with. You’re absolutely right in what you’re saying. I understand that the “Big” words are often easy for us to use, but most people understand you much easier and have a more pleasant time reading your work if you speak direct toward them in words they are familiar with.

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-399 Bobby W parker Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:27:09 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-399 "I have to admit that I sometimes get a kick out of saying to my dogs, “Want to go for a ride in the car?” when I have no intention of taking them any where." Now that is down right mean :). Keep up the great posts. For keyword strength it would be a mistake to use words that mean nothing to your end users. Working for a custom home builder we might be tempted to use words that mean something to us, but mean nothing to our potential clients. An example would be replacing the work LEED with the word Green. Mr John, who is looking for an echo friendly house, will probably search for Green builders instead of Leed builders. “I have to admit that I sometimes get a kick out of saying to my dogs, “Want to go for a ride in the car?” when I have no intention of taking them any where.”
Now that is down right mean .
Keep up the great posts. For keyword strength it would be a mistake to use words that mean nothing to your end users. Working for a custom home builder we might be tempted to use words that mean something to us, but mean nothing to our potential clients. An example would be replacing the work LEED with the word Green. Mr John, who is looking for an echo friendly house, will probably search for Green builders instead of Leed builders.

]]> http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1609 Bobby W parker Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:27:00 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/2008/12/for-the-dogs/#comment-1609 "I have to admit that I sometimes get a kick out of saying to my dogs, “Want to go for a ride in the car?” when I have no intention of taking them any where." Now that is down right mean :). Keep up the great posts. For keyword strength it would be a mistake to use words that mean nothing to your end users. Working for a custom home builder we might be tempted to use words that mean something to us, but mean nothing to our potential clients. An example would be replacing the work LEED with the word Green. Mr John, who is looking for an echo friendly house, will probably search for Green builders instead of Leed builders. “I have to admit that I sometimes get a kick out of saying to my dogs, “Want to go for a ride in the car?” when I have no intention of taking them any where.”
Now that is down right mean .
Keep up the great posts. For keyword strength it would be a mistake to use words that mean nothing to your end users. Working for a custom home builder we might be tempted to use words that mean something to us, but mean nothing to our potential clients. An example would be replacing the work LEED with the word Green. Mr John, who is looking for an echo friendly house, will probably search for Green builders instead of Leed builders.

]]>