Comments on: What is Web 3.0, anyway? http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/06/what-is-web-30-anyway/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:35:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Richard http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/06/what-is-web-30-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-716 Richard Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:47:57 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=490#comment-716 I'll like it if people stop calling it "Web 3.0". It's a constant evolution of technologies and ideas. It's not like we have a subversion repository. What happened to "Web 3.0RC1" or even "Web 0.9a"?<br><br>Honestly, I've hated the term "Web x.x" ever since O'Reilly popularized it. It has become a buzzword for many internet developers and designers which they all proudly pin on their website "We are Web 2.0".<br><br>Aside from being an overused buzzword which I can't seem to get away from it does not really describe anything. It's an opinion, and as such does not really define anything. As is highlighted by the section in your post "What is Web 3.0?", all your references are the opinions of the author.<br><br>Not that my opinion matters in the grander scheme of things, but I feel that a term should be changed to something less generic and more descriptive. Something like (note that this is an example not a suggestion cause I suck at these sort of things) "Intelligent Internet" instead of "Web 3.0" or "Social Internet" instead of "Web 2.0". I'll like it if people stop calling it “Web 3.0″. It's a constant evolution of technologies and ideas. It's not like we have a subversion repository. What happened to “Web 3.0RC1″ or even “Web 0.9a”?

Honestly, I've hated the term “Web x.x” ever since O'Reilly popularized it. It has become a buzzword for many internet developers and designers which they all proudly pin on their website “We are Web 2.0″.

Aside from being an overused buzzword which I can't seem to get away from it does not really describe anything. It's an opinion, and as such does not really define anything. As is highlighted by the section in your post “What is Web 3.0?”, all your references are the opinions of the author.

Not that my opinion matters in the grander scheme of things, but I feel that a term should be changed to something less generic and more descriptive. Something like (note that this is an example not a suggestion cause I suck at these sort of things) “Intelligent Internet” instead of “Web 3.0″ or “Social Internet” instead of “Web 2.0″.

]]> By: Richard http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/06/what-is-web-30-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-477 Richard Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:57 +0000 http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=490#comment-477 I'll like it if people stop calling it "Web 3.0". It's a constant evolution of technologies and ideas. It's not like we have a subversion repository. What happened to "Web 3.0RC1" or even "Web 0.9a"?<br><br>Honestly, I've hated the term "Web x.x" ever since O'Reilly popularized it. It has become a buzzword for many internet developers and designers which they all proudly pin on their website "We are Web 2.0".<br><br>Aside from being an overused buzzword which I can't seem to get away from it does not really describe anything. It's an opinion, and as such does not really define anything. As is highlighted by the section in your post "What is Web 3.0?", all your references are the opinions of the author.<br><br>Not that my opinion matters in the grander scheme of things, but I feel that a term should be changed to something less generic and more descriptive. Something like (note that this is an example not a suggestion cause I suck at these sort of things) "Intelligent Internet" instead of "Web 3.0" or "Social Internet" instead of "Web 2.0". I'll like it if people stop calling it “Web 3.0″. It's a constant evolution of technologies and ideas. It's not like we have a subversion repository. What happened to “Web 3.0RC1″ or even “Web 0.9a”?

Honestly, I've hated the term “Web x.x” ever since O'Reilly popularized it. It has become a buzzword for many internet developers and designers which they all proudly pin on their website “We are Web 2.0″.

Aside from being an overused buzzword which I can't seem to get away from it does not really describe anything. It's an opinion, and as such does not really define anything. As is highlighted by the section in your post “What is Web 3.0?”, all your references are the opinions of the author.

Not that my opinion matters in the grander scheme of things, but I feel that a term should be changed to something less generic and more descriptive. Something like (note that this is an example not a suggestion cause I suck at these sort of things) “Intelligent Internet” instead of “Web 3.0″ or “Social Internet” instead of “Web 2.0″.

]]>