<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advice From The Pros: Telling It Like It Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:34:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-700</guid>
		<description>I am guilty of using some of these words.  I love &quot;facilitate.&quot;  I guess I like how it sounds.  It is fun to say.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there occasions where you believe these words are acceptable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guilty of using some of these words.  I love &#8220;facilitate.&#8221;  I guess I like how it sounds.  It is fun to say.  </p>
<p>Are there occasions where you believe these words are acceptable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I am guilty of using some of these words.  I love &quot;facilitate.&quot;  I guess I like how it sounds.  It is fun to say.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there occasions where you believe these words are acceptable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guilty of using some of these words.  I love &#8220;facilitate.&#8221;  I guess I like how it sounds.  It is fun to say.  </p>
<p>Are there occasions where you believe these words are acceptable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Same goes for &quot;utilize.&quot; Like Lon says, stick to &quot;use&quot; - a tidy word tired of having stuff appended to its little butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Same goes for &#8220;utilize.&#8221; Like Lon says, stick to &#8220;use&#8221; &#8211; a tidy word tired of having stuff appended to its little butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Yo Katie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Relevant&quot; is a useful, sales-tool kind of word that people frequently misuse. The problem is that things cannot be, in and of themselves, relevant or not relevant. They need to be relevant TO something or not relevant TO something.  Thus these sentences taken from your article above, are incomplete:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &quot;Anything that’s not entirely relevant or usable has got to go&quot; &quot;Here’s what’s most relevant in terms of the work we do every day&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Web writing is different from other kinds of writing, but some rules apply across the board, and this is one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Katie.</p>
<p>&#8220;Relevant&#8221; is a useful, sales-tool kind of word that people frequently misuse. The problem is that things cannot be, in and of themselves, relevant or not relevant. They need to be relevant TO something or not relevant TO something.  Thus these sentences taken from your article above, are incomplete:</p>
<p> &#8220;Anything that’s not entirely relevant or usable has got to go&#8221; &#8220;Here’s what’s most relevant in terms of the work we do every day&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, Web writing is different from other kinds of writing, but some rules apply across the board, and this is one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Haley</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-485</guid>
		<description>We absolutely have to hammer home your first point: “The simplest sentences and websites take the most thought,” because the KISS mantra has actually done a disservice to content. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After hearing “keep it simple” and “users don’t read on the web” ad nauseam from so many “experts,” clients and design firms have taken this to mean that content is easy to produce. Thus all the 13th-hour (if at all) content deliveries, and general content disrespect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, yes: good content is simple, smart, and strategic. KISSS. (Or KISSAS.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We absolutely have to hammer home your first point: “The simplest sentences and websites take the most thought,” because the KISS mantra has actually done a disservice to content. </p>
<p>After hearing “keep it simple” and “users don’t read on the web” ad nauseam from so many “experts,” clients and design firms have taken this to mean that content is easy to produce. Thus all the 13th-hour (if at all) content deliveries, and general content disrespect.</p>
<p>So, yes: good content is simple, smart, and strategic. KISSS. (Or KISSAS.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Haley</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-483</guid>
		<description>We absolutely have to hammer home your first point: “The simplest sentences and websites take the most thought,” because the KISS mantra has actually done a disservice to content. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After hearing “keep it simple” and “users don’t read on the web” ad nauseam from so many “experts,” clients and design firms have taken this to mean that content is easy to produce. Thus all the 13th-hour (if at all) content deliveries, and general content disrespect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, yes: good content is simple, smart, and strategic. KISSS. (Or KISSAS.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We absolutely have to hammer home your first point: “The simplest sentences and websites take the most thought,” because the KISS mantra has actually done a disservice to content. </p>
<p>After hearing “keep it simple” and “users don’t read on the web” ad nauseam from so many “experts,” clients and design firms have taken this to mean that content is easy to produce. Thus all the 13th-hour (if at all) content deliveries, and general content disrespect.</p>
<p>So, yes: good content is simple, smart, and strategic. KISSS. (Or KISSAS.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon Koenig</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon Koenig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-482</guid>
		<description>&quot;Usage.&quot; Just say no. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, more literally, just say &quot;use.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Usage.&#8221; Just say no. </p>
<p>Well, more literally, just say &#8220;use.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bencurnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>bencurnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Zinsser fan checking in.  Your point about On Writing Well having golden rules on every page is dead on.  Here&#039;s what I just opened to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;...revisions...are mainly matters of carpentry: altering the sequence, tightening the flow, sharpening the point.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Timeless.  Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zinsser fan checking in.  Your point about On Writing Well having golden rules on every page is dead on.  Here&#39;s what I just opened to:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;revisions&#8230;are mainly matters of carpentry: altering the sequence, tightening the flow, sharpening the point.&#8221;</p>
<p>Timeless.  Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul, copysnips.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/advice-from-the-pros-telling-it-like-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul, copysnips.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=495#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great post... and also the list of long words into short words. The bottom line is... KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great post&#8230; and also the list of long words into short words. The bottom line is&#8230; KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
