<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Put a lid on canned copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbloomstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>mbloomstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Such a small post about a small statement--but wow, can it have a big impact!  You raise great points Meghan.  Anyone who creates or manages content should be aware of the &quot;quiet types,&quot; those bits of copy that seems to sneak in without invitation, a byproduct of the template or a long-forgotten setting in the CMS.  Even if you don&#039;t notice it, your audience does--maybe in the form of instructional copy, unhelpful &quot;guidance&quot; beside search results, or a completely irrelevant sidebar focus area.  Moral of the story? All copy should be intentional and appropriate, whether a person or CMS puts it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a small post about a small statement&#8211;but wow, can it have a big impact!  You raise great points Meghan.  Anyone who creates or manages content should be aware of the &#8220;quiet types,&#8221; those bits of copy that seems to sneak in without invitation, a byproduct of the template or a long-forgotten setting in the CMS.  Even if you don&#39;t notice it, your audience does&#8211;maybe in the form of instructional copy, unhelpful &#8220;guidance&#8221; beside search results, or a completely irrelevant sidebar focus area.  Moral of the story? All copy should be intentional and appropriate, whether a person or CMS puts it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhutson</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>dhutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Good advice, Meghan. The worst thing about &quot;I hope you found this article enjoyable&quot; isn&#039;t that it&#039;s canned (although that&#039;s bad enough), it&#039;s that it&#039;s meaningless. If you left it off, nothing would be lost. Next steps/how to contact us/where to get more info make sense; empty platitudes, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice, Meghan. The worst thing about &#8220;I hope you found this article enjoyable&#8221; isn&#39;t that it&#39;s canned (although that&#39;s bad enough), it&#39;s that it&#39;s meaningless. If you left it off, nothing would be lost. Next steps/how to contact us/where to get more info make sense; empty platitudes, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bencurnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>bencurnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-708</guid>
		<description>KM, that&#039;s exactly what I thought of when I read this.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meghan, nice use of oompa-loompa as a nasty epithet.  I hope your dog is O.K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KM, that&#39;s exactly what I thought of when I read this.  </p>
<p>Meghan, nice use of oompa-loompa as a nasty epithet.  I hope your dog is O.K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbloomstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>mbloomstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Such a small post about a small statement--but wow, can it have a big impact!  You raise great points Meghan.  Anyone who creates or manages content should be aware of the &quot;quiet types,&quot; those bits of copy that seems to sneak in without invitation, a byproduct of the template or a long-forgotten setting in the CMS.  Even if you don&#039;t notice it, your audience does--maybe in the form of instructional copy, unhelpful &quot;guidance&quot; beside search results, or a completely irrelevant sidebar focus area.  Moral of the story? All copy should be intentional and appropriate, whether a person or CMS puts it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a small post about a small statement&#8211;but wow, can it have a big impact!  You raise great points Meghan.  Anyone who creates or manages content should be aware of the &#8220;quiet types,&#8221; those bits of copy that seems to sneak in without invitation, a byproduct of the template or a long-forgotten setting in the CMS.  Even if you don&#39;t notice it, your audience does&#8211;maybe in the form of instructional copy, unhelpful &#8220;guidance&#8221; beside search results, or a completely irrelevant sidebar focus area.  Moral of the story? All copy should be intentional and appropriate, whether a person or CMS puts it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhutson</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>dhutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Good advice, Meghan. The worst thing about &quot;I hope you found this article enjoyable&quot; isn&#039;t that it&#039;s canned (although that&#039;s bad enough), it&#039;s that it&#039;s meaningless. If you left it off, nothing would be lost. Next steps/how to contact us/where to get more info make sense; empty platitudes, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice, Meghan. The worst thing about &#8220;I hope you found this article enjoyable&#8221; isn&#39;t that it&#39;s canned (although that&#39;s bad enough), it&#39;s that it&#39;s meaningless. If you left it off, nothing would be lost. Next steps/how to contact us/where to get more info make sense; empty platitudes, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bencurnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>bencurnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-496</guid>
		<description>KM, that&#039;s exactly what I thought of when I read this.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meghan, nice use of oompa-loompa as a nasty epithet.  I hope your dog is O.K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KM, that&#39;s exactly what I thought of when I read this.  </p>
<p>Meghan, nice use of oompa-loompa as a nasty epithet.  I hope your dog is O.K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMcGrane</title>
		<link>http://blog.braintraffic.com/2009/07/put-a-lid-on-canned-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>KMcGrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.braintraffic.com/?p=513#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a hilarious and disturbing example of canned content gone horribly awry. The Guinness Book of World Records used canned links to encourage visitors to break the world record for &quot;Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act”  (via Fail Blog.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://failblog.org/2009/07/13/omg-u-fail-so-hard/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://failblog.org/2009/07/13/omg-u-fail-so-hard/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s a hilarious and disturbing example of canned content gone horribly awry. The Guinness Book of World Records used canned links to encourage visitors to break the world record for &#8220;Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act”  (via Fail Blog.)<br /><a href="http://failblog.org/2009/07/13/omg-u-fail-so-hard/" rel="nofollow">http://failblog.org/2009/07/13/omg-u-fail-so-hard/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

